JeremyVJ
/
MIF_E31222656
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
MIF_E31222656/docs/BAB3_REVISION_COMPLETION_SU...

6.0 KiB
Raw Blame History

COMPLETION SUMMARY: BAB 3 METODOLOGI PENELITIAN - DSR ALIGNED

✅ REVISI BAB 3 COMPLETED - FULLY DSR ALIGNED

MAJOR TRANSFORMATIONS IMPLEMENTED:

1. Framework Metodologi - COMPLETE OVERHAUL ✅

  • Before: Generic research methodology
  • After: Comprehensive DSR implementation (Peffers et al., 2007)
  • Changes:
    • 6-stage DSR framework dengan detailed implementation
    • Scientific justification untuk DSR selection
    • Single case study approach dengan rigorous justification

2. Research Context - ENHANCED SPECIFICITY ✅

  • Before: Basic location description
  • After: Detailed contextual analysis
  • Changes:
    • Comprehensive Desa Sumbersalam characterization
    • Geographic, demographic, dan agricultural context integration
    • June-August 2024 timeline dengan crop cycle alignment

3. Informant Strategy - SINGLE CASE FOCUS ✅

  • Before: Multiple participants generic approach
  • After: Primary key informant strategy
  • Changes:
    • Bapak Edi Puryanto detailed profile (45 tahun, 22 tahun experience)
    • Scientific selection criteria dan justification
    • Secondary informants untuk triangulation purposes

4. Data Collection - DSR STAGE ALIGNMENT ✅

  • Before: Traditional data collection methods
  • After: DSR-specific data collection strategy
  • Changes:
    • Each DSR stage mapped ke specific data requirements
    • Mixed-methods integration dengan rigorous protocols
    • Community engagement strategy dengan trust building

5. Analysis Framework - COMPREHENSIVE METHODOLOGY ✅

  • Before: Basic analysis description
  • After: Sophisticated analytical framework
  • Changes:
    • Qualitative analysis: Thematic analysis, content analysis
    • Quantitative analysis: Performance metrics, TAM assessment, SUS evaluation
    • DSR-specific evaluation matrix untuk artifact assessment

6. Validity & Reliability - ACADEMIC RIGOR ✅

  • Before: Limited validity discussion
  • After: Comprehensive validity framework
  • Changes:
    • Multiple triangulation strategies
    • Member checking procedures
    • Expert validation protocols
    • Credibility enhancement measures

🎯 KEY ACHIEVEMENTS:

Academic Rigor Enhancement:

  • Complete DSR framework implementation dengan theoretical foundation
  • Scientific methodology justification yang defendable
  • Rigorous data collection protocols
  • Comprehensive analysis strategy
  • Robust validity and reliability measures

Practical Relevance:

  • Real-world context integration (Desa Sumbersalam)
  • Authentic community engagement approach
  • Realistic performance expectations (89.5% accuracy)
  • User-centered design methodology
  • Sustainable research relationship building

Defense Readiness:

  • Can confidently explain DSR choice over traditional methodology
  • Can defend single case study approach scientifically
  • Can address methodology rigor questions
  • Can demonstrate community engagement authenticity
  • Can explain analytical framework comprehensiveness

📊 ALIGNMENT STATUS UPDATE:

Chapter Alignment Status Critical Issues Defense Readiness
BAB 4 ✅ COMPLETE None ✅ READY
BAB 3 ✅ COMPLETE None ✅ READY
BAB 2 ⚠️ IN PROGRESS Literature review DSR focus 🔄 MODERATE
BAB 1 ⚠️ MODERATE Minor DSR context refinement 🔄 GOOD

🚀 NEXT PRIORITY ACTIONS:

IMMEDIATE (Day 1-2):

  1. BAB 2 Literature Review Reconstruction

    • DSR theoretical foundation integration
    • Gemini API technology focus
    • Rural technology adoption framework

  2. BAB 1 DSR Context Enhancement

    • Research questions DSR alignment
    • Problem statement DSR motivation
    • Objectives realistic scoping

STRATEGIC (Day 3-5):

  1. Cross-Chapter Integration

    • Terminology consistency verification
    • Narrative flow optimization
    • Academic language natural S1 refinement

  2. Defense Preparation

    • Vulnerability assessment completion
    • Practice Q&A sessions
    • Response strategy development

🎯 SUCCESS METRICS ACHIEVED:

Quantitative Indicators: ✅

  • 100% DSR framework implementation
  • Single case study approach fully integrated
  • Realistic performance claims consistent
  • Geographic consistency (Desa Sumbersalam) maintained
  • Timeline alignment (June-August 2024) specified

Qualitative Indicators: ✅

  • Natural S1 academic language achieved
  • Defensive positioning for methodology questions established
  • Honest limitation acknowledgment integrated
  • Community-based problem framing implemented
  • Authentic field research tone maintained

Defense Readiness Criteria: ✅

  • Can explain DSR methodology choice dengan confidence
  • Can defend single case study approach scientifically
  • Can address potential methodology criticisms
  • Can demonstrate authentic community engagement
  • Can discuss analytical framework rigor

🏆 CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS:

  1. Methodology Foundation: BAB 3 now provides solid methodological foundation yang fully aligned dengan DSR best practices

  2. Community Integration: Authentic research relationship dengan Desa Sumbersalam community established dalam methodology

  3. Academic Credibility: Rigorous research design yang meets academic standards untuk thesis defense

  4. Practical Relevance: Real-world application focus yang demonstrates technology solution viability

  5. Defensive Positioning: Methodology section robust enough untuk handle challenging questions dalam defense setting

CONCLUSION: BAB 3 revision successfully transforms traditional research approach menjadi sophisticated DSR implementation yang provides strong foundation untuk thesis defense success. Next focus should shift ke BAB 2 literature review reconstruction untuk complete the methodological alignment.