MIF_E31222656/docs/BAB_1-3_IMPLEMENTATION_PRIORITY_MATRIX.md

PRIORITY MATRIX: IMPLEMENTASI REVISI BAB 1-3

🚨 CRITICAL IMMEDIATE ACTIONS (HARI 1-2)

Priority 1: BAB 3 METODOLOGI - CRITICAL OVERHAUL

Why Critical: Defense akan fokus pada methodology validation Risk Level: EXTREME - Potential failed defense if not fixed

Immediate Actions Required:

1. Complete DSR Framework Implementation

   • Replace traditional methodology dengan 6-stage DSR (Peffers et al., 2007)
   • Integrate single case study approach dengan scientific justification
   • Align data collection methods dengan DSR evaluation criteria

2. Single Case Study Justification

   • Scientific basis untuk choosing Desa Sumbersalam
   • Key informant selection criteria (Bapak Edi Puryanto)
   • Depth vs breadth research approach justification

3. Authentic Data Collection Alignment

   • Field research protocol untuk June-August 2024
   • Performance metrics realistic expectations (89.5% accuracy)
   • Failure documentation and analysis framework

Priority 2: BAB 2 LITERATURE REVIEW - MAJOR RECONSTRUCTION

Why Critical: Academic foundation untuk entire thesis Risk Level: HIGH - Weak theoretical foundation

Immediate Actions Required:

1. DSR Literature Integration

   • Hevner et al. (2004) foundational framework
   • Peffers et al. (2007) process model implementation
   • Recent DSR applications dalam agriculture technology

2. Gemini API Technology Focus

   • Complete elimination of Plant.id references
   • Gemini API advantages in Indonesian agriculture context
   • Multimodal AI capabilities specific benefits

3. Rural Technology Adoption Framework

   • Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) dalam rural context
   • Indonesian farmer characteristics and challenges
   • Single case study methodology validation

Priority 3: BAB 1 REFINEMENT - MODERATE ADJUSTMENTS

Why Important: First impression dan research positioning Risk Level: MEDIUM - Currently acceptable but can be optimized

Targeted Improvements:

1. DSR Context Integration

   • Stronger DSR motivation dalam latar belakang
   • Research questions aligned dengan DSR stages
   • Realistic objectives dengan measurable outcomes

2. Field Research Emphasis

   • Desa Sumbersalam specific context strengthening
   • Economic impact quantification (Rp 3-5 juta loss)
   • Community-based problem identification

---

⏰ IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

WEEK 1: FOUNDATION RECONSTRUCTION

Day 1-2: BAB 3 Emergency Reconstruction

• Morning: DSR framework complete implementation
• Afternoon: Single case study methodology scientific justification
• Evening: Data collection protocol alignment dengan authentic research

Day 3-4: BAB 2 Literature Foundation

• Morning: DSR theoretical framework integration
• Afternoon: Gemini API technology literature consolidation
• Evening: Rural technology adoption framework development

Day 5: BAB 1 Strategic Refinement

• Morning: DSR context integration dalam latar belakang
• Afternoon: Research questions dan objectives alignment
• Evening: Cross-chapter consistency verification

WEEK 2: INTEGRATION & QUALITY ASSURANCE

Day 6-7: Content Integration

• Cross-chapter narrative flow optimization
• Terminology consistency verification
• Academic language natural S1 refinement

Day 8-9: Defense Preparation

• Vulnerability assessment dan mitigation strategies
• Practice Q&A sessions focusing on methodology
• Final integration dengan BAB 4 authentic content

Day 10: Final Quality Check

• Complete thesis coherence verification
• Academic supervisor review dan feedback incorporation
• Defense readiness final assessment

---

🎯 SUCCESS METRICS

Quantitative Indicators:

• 100% elimination of Plant.id references
• 6-stage DSR framework complete implementation
• Single case study approach fully integrated
• Realistic performance claims (89.5% accuracy) consistent across chapters
• Geographic consistency (Desa Sumbersalam) throughout thesis

Qualitative Indicators:

• Natural S1 academic language consistency
• Defensive positioning for methodology questions
• Honest limitation acknowledgment
• Community-based problem framing
• Authentic field research tone maintained

Defense Readiness Criteria:

• Can confidently explain DSR methodology choice
• Can defend single case study approach scientifically
• Can discuss Gemini API selection rationale
• Can address potential methodology criticisms
• Can demonstrate authentic community engagement

---

🚨 RISK MITIGATION STRATEGIES

High-Risk Scenarios & Mitigation:

1. "Why DSR instead of traditional methodology?"

   • Preparation: Strong theoretical justification dari Hevner et al. (2004)
   • Practice: Design science paradigm appropriateness untuk technology development

2. "Why single case study instead of broader survey?"

   • Preparation: Depth vs breadth research approach academic justification
   • Practice: Community-based intensive research advantages

3. "How do you ensure Gemini API reliability?"

   • Preparation: Honest discussion of limitations + backup strategies
   • Practice: Focus on usability evaluation rather than technology effectiveness claims

4. "What about sample size validity?"

   • Preparation: Qualitative research paradigm explanation
   • Practice: Technology acceptance focus rather than statistical generalization

---

📋 IMMEDIATE NEXT STEPS

1. Start with BAB 3 Reconstruction (Most Critical)
2. Use prepared templates from BAB3_REVISION_TEMPLATE_DSR_IMPLEMENTATION.md
3. Maintain authentic data approach consistent with BAB 4
4. Focus on defensive positioning for thesis defense
5. Regular cross-reference dengan completed BAB 4 for consistency

GOAL: Transform thesis dari generic academic work menjadi solid DSR implementation dengan authentic field research foundation yang defendable dalam academic setting.