159 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
159 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
# PRIORITY MATRIX: IMPLEMENTASI REVISI BAB 1-3
|
|
|
|
## 🚨 CRITICAL IMMEDIATE ACTIONS (HARI 1-2)
|
|
|
|
### **Priority 1: BAB 3 METODOLOGI - CRITICAL OVERHAUL**
|
|
**Why Critical**: Defense akan fokus pada methodology validation
|
|
**Risk Level**: EXTREME - Potential failed defense if not fixed
|
|
|
|
**Immediate Actions Required**:
|
|
|
|
1. **Complete DSR Framework Implementation**
|
|
- Replace traditional methodology dengan 6-stage DSR (Peffers et al., 2007)
|
|
- Integrate single case study approach dengan scientific justification
|
|
- Align data collection methods dengan DSR evaluation criteria
|
|
|
|
2. **Single Case Study Justification**
|
|
- Scientific basis untuk choosing Desa Sumbersalam
|
|
- Key informant selection criteria (Bapak Edi Puryanto)
|
|
- Depth vs breadth research approach justification
|
|
|
|
3. **Authentic Data Collection Alignment**
|
|
- Field research protocol untuk June-August 2024
|
|
- Performance metrics realistic expectations (89.5% accuracy)
|
|
- Failure documentation and analysis framework
|
|
|
|
### **Priority 2: BAB 2 LITERATURE REVIEW - MAJOR RECONSTRUCTION**
|
|
**Why Critical**: Academic foundation untuk entire thesis
|
|
**Risk Level**: HIGH - Weak theoretical foundation
|
|
|
|
**Immediate Actions Required**:
|
|
|
|
1. **DSR Literature Integration**
|
|
- Hevner et al. (2004) foundational framework
|
|
- Peffers et al. (2007) process model implementation
|
|
- Recent DSR applications dalam agriculture technology
|
|
|
|
2. **Gemini API Technology Focus**
|
|
- Complete elimination of Plant.id references
|
|
- Gemini API advantages in Indonesian agriculture context
|
|
- Multimodal AI capabilities specific benefits
|
|
|
|
3. **Rural Technology Adoption Framework**
|
|
- Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) dalam rural context
|
|
- Indonesian farmer characteristics and challenges
|
|
- Single case study methodology validation
|
|
|
|
### **Priority 3: BAB 1 REFINEMENT - MODERATE ADJUSTMENTS**
|
|
**Why Important**: First impression dan research positioning
|
|
**Risk Level**: MEDIUM - Currently acceptable but can be optimized
|
|
|
|
**Targeted Improvements**:
|
|
|
|
1. **DSR Context Integration**
|
|
- Stronger DSR motivation dalam latar belakang
|
|
- Research questions aligned dengan DSR stages
|
|
- Realistic objectives dengan measurable outcomes
|
|
|
|
2. **Field Research Emphasis**
|
|
- Desa Sumbersalam specific context strengthening
|
|
- Economic impact quantification (Rp 3-5 juta loss)
|
|
- Community-based problem identification
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## ⏰ IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
|
|
|
|
### **WEEK 1: FOUNDATION RECONSTRUCTION**
|
|
|
|
**Day 1-2: BAB 3 Emergency Reconstruction**
|
|
- Morning: DSR framework complete implementation
|
|
- Afternoon: Single case study methodology scientific justification
|
|
- Evening: Data collection protocol alignment dengan authentic research
|
|
|
|
**Day 3-4: BAB 2 Literature Foundation**
|
|
- Morning: DSR theoretical framework integration
|
|
- Afternoon: Gemini API technology literature consolidation
|
|
- Evening: Rural technology adoption framework development
|
|
|
|
**Day 5: BAB 1 Strategic Refinement**
|
|
- Morning: DSR context integration dalam latar belakang
|
|
- Afternoon: Research questions dan objectives alignment
|
|
- Evening: Cross-chapter consistency verification
|
|
|
|
### **WEEK 2: INTEGRATION & QUALITY ASSURANCE**
|
|
|
|
**Day 6-7: Content Integration**
|
|
- Cross-chapter narrative flow optimization
|
|
- Terminology consistency verification
|
|
- Academic language natural S1 refinement
|
|
|
|
**Day 8-9: Defense Preparation**
|
|
- Vulnerability assessment dan mitigation strategies
|
|
- Practice Q&A sessions focusing on methodology
|
|
- Final integration dengan BAB 4 authentic content
|
|
|
|
**Day 10: Final Quality Check**
|
|
- Complete thesis coherence verification
|
|
- Academic supervisor review dan feedback incorporation
|
|
- Defense readiness final assessment
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🎯 SUCCESS METRICS
|
|
|
|
### **Quantitative Indicators**:
|
|
- [ ] 100% elimination of Plant.id references
|
|
- [ ] 6-stage DSR framework complete implementation
|
|
- [ ] Single case study approach fully integrated
|
|
- [ ] Realistic performance claims (89.5% accuracy) consistent across chapters
|
|
- [ ] Geographic consistency (Desa Sumbersalam) throughout thesis
|
|
|
|
### **Qualitative Indicators**:
|
|
- [ ] Natural S1 academic language consistency
|
|
- [ ] Defensive positioning for methodology questions
|
|
- [ ] Honest limitation acknowledgment
|
|
- [ ] Community-based problem framing
|
|
- [ ] Authentic field research tone maintained
|
|
|
|
### **Defense Readiness Criteria**:
|
|
- [ ] Can confidently explain DSR methodology choice
|
|
- [ ] Can defend single case study approach scientifically
|
|
- [ ] Can discuss Gemini API selection rationale
|
|
- [ ] Can address potential methodology criticisms
|
|
- [ ] Can demonstrate authentic community engagement
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🚨 RISK MITIGATION STRATEGIES
|
|
|
|
### **High-Risk Scenarios & Mitigation**:
|
|
|
|
1. **"Why DSR instead of traditional methodology?"**
|
|
- **Preparation**: Strong theoretical justification dari Hevner et al. (2004)
|
|
- **Practice**: Design science paradigm appropriateness untuk technology development
|
|
|
|
2. **"Why single case study instead of broader survey?"**
|
|
- **Preparation**: Depth vs breadth research approach academic justification
|
|
- **Practice**: Community-based intensive research advantages
|
|
|
|
3. **"How do you ensure Gemini API reliability?"**
|
|
- **Preparation**: Honest discussion of limitations + backup strategies
|
|
- **Practice**: Focus on usability evaluation rather than technology effectiveness claims
|
|
|
|
4. **"What about sample size validity?"**
|
|
- **Preparation**: Qualitative research paradigm explanation
|
|
- **Practice**: Technology acceptance focus rather than statistical generalization
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 📋 IMMEDIATE NEXT STEPS
|
|
|
|
1. **Start with BAB 3 Reconstruction** (Most Critical)
|
|
2. **Use prepared templates** from BAB3_REVISION_TEMPLATE_DSR_IMPLEMENTATION.md
|
|
3. **Maintain authentic data approach** consistent with BAB 4
|
|
4. **Focus on defensive positioning** for thesis defense
|
|
5. **Regular cross-reference** dengan completed BAB 4 for consistency
|
|
|
|
**GOAL**: Transform thesis dari generic academic work menjadi solid DSR implementation dengan authentic field research foundation yang defendable dalam academic setting.
|